As it is known, while the “Regulation on Amending the Regulation on Unlicensed Electricity Production in the Electricity Market” was published on May 9, 2021, Article 5.1.h entered our lives with the regulation.
When we take a look at the addition made here: “For the investments in the distribution facility and/or transmission facility of the generation facilities to be established within the scope of subparagraph (h) of the first paragraph of Article 5, the procedure shall be established within the framework of the provision
Article 5.1.h directly affects 2 other articles here. One is the 17th paragraph of the 7th article; “For the investments in the distribution facility and/or transmission facility of the generation facilities to be established within the scope of subparagraph (h) of the first paragraph of Article 5, the procedure shall be established within the framework of the provision in the Electricity Market Connection and System Use Regulation.”
According to the Unlicensed Electricity Regulation, the retail company will pay the fine, not the distribution company. Because the main danger is here in projects made according to Article 30.1 of Article 5.1.h. That is, in the contractual strength of the agreement with the retailer.
While the purchase price of the licensed YEKA GES-3 tender on the land decreases to 18.5 kurus per kilowatt hour, most people will see this as an “investment door” and will choose to increase their contracting power in order to sell electricity to the state by using clause 5.1.h in SPPs. This action could backfire in the future and could result in hefty fines from the retail company…
Dipl. eng. (FH) Hasan YİĞİT – hasan@enerjibaba.com
CLICK for the Rest of The Article >>>